Part Two: diamond rings

diamonds.

What was once treasured as a precious gemstone for only people of noble and bourgeois birth, new prospects increased the supply of diamonds throughout the nineteenth century, which opened mass-market availability and consumption.

These new prospects were in fact directly related to the dispossession of Indigenous peoples in the African colonies, and then later in another British colony closer to home, Canada. The continued growth of the global capitalist economy, and with the support of ‘successful’, emotionally driven advertising campaigns, the consumer consciousness and the desire for recognition in diamond engagement rings increased across the world.

The DeBeers love story, “Diamonds are Forever”, engagement ring symbolized everlasting love, and represented the lasting bond and commitment between two people. This advertising campaign created new markets in countries, such as Canada and the United States, where there was NO previous ‘tradition’ of diamond engagement rings.

This narrative continues to use celebrities and royalty to market this idea of a noble tradition which upholds a limited concept of love, which Hardt and Negri explore:

“The modern concept of love is almost exclusively limited to the bourgeois couple and the claustrophobic confines of the nuclear family. Love has become a strictly private affair. We need a more generous and more unrestrained conception of love.” (2005, 352)

Richardson’s Jewelry, St. Paul, Alberta Nehiyaw and Métis Territories  December 2013

“What Women Really Want” Richardson’s Jewelry, St. Paul, Alberta
Nehiyaw and Métis Territories
December 2013

Furthermore, this story is rooted in an external recognition of the love we have in our relationships, and continues to support a heteronormative and heteropatriarchal perceptions of romantic relationships.

“Men are convinced that their love for their future wife is directly proportional to the expense of the diamond ring, [which] also convinces women to expect love [and security] in the form of a shiny stone” (Moosa 2013).

I can attest to that. Working at Spence Diamonds, I had men running into the store asking me if they needed to save three months salary to buy a meaningful ring for their true love. Think about it. Where did they hear that story? Advertising. But don’t worry. Capitalism has a sliding scale for love based on personal salary. How noble.

Ok, some of you are probably thinking, she’s bitter and jaded and single – so spite me… Wait, no…

Call me, maybe.

Yes, I agree, Indigenous people can integrate new traditions into our cultures and ancestors’ stories; so let’s explore this story further…

Let’s start by looking more closely at the initial discovery of diamonds, and then at the “ethical” Canadian diamond.

Diamonds were discovered in the mid 1800s in the Cape Colony, which is now South Africa. As colonial governments were “relinquishing” control over the colonized, their capitalist offspring, the new wave of resource extraction corporations, took their place, conveniently in a space of confusion and vulnerability.

Cecil Rhodes founded DeBeers to take control over the diamond exploration in South Africa. He was an English businessman and opportunist, and happened to be a colonialist and colonizer, or the British History 101 version, a politician of South Africa during the same time as his business ventures. He has been historically acknowledged for his integral role in southern African and British imperial history (Woodhouse).

Fast forward to Millennial Canada. After all, the high arctic relocations didn’t end up helping Canada’s claim to sovereignty, because of human rights issues, the “discovery” of diamonds in the North was seen as a necessary progression in the assertion of Canadian state sovereignty. Canada’s last frontier can finally be developed…

But what does that mean for the nations of that land?

Diamond mining further dispossesses nations from the land: our northern relatives, the Gwich’in, the Dene, the Inuit, and northern Nehiyaw nations, and our animal nations which includes the caribou, wolverine, bear, ptarmigan, and fish nations.

Expediency for extraction creates inadequate regulatory frameworks at the municipal, territorial, federal level, and contentiously negotiated self-government and impact benefit agreements, in addition to pipeline pressures. Furthermore, these mines mean cultural and social disruption for the local nations, with few financial LONGTERM benefits.

Ekati, Diavik, Jericho, and Victor (the diamond mine next to Attawapiskat) are all diamond mines in Canada that have caused a disruption in the social fabric in these communities, affecting relationships from the collective level to the very intimate and personal.

Ellen Bielaski, a past dean of the Faculty of Native Studies and author of Rogue Diamonds, through her experience with the Dene people, found “no tradition of digging into the ground for diamonds,… [rather] diamonds became the stuff of hierarchy and ornament, while the Dene lived as nomadic hunters in a land that required travelling light and moving often” (2003, 24). Furthermore, through her research, she declared that “diamonds and other minerals fuelled the founding of apartheid” (2003, 25).

The diamond as a love story is an imperial, colonial, and capitalist love story. Colonial governments work with capitalist/neoliberal projects, such as the diamond extraction industry, and use advertising to create narratives of consumer demand to justify production, which ultimately means further land dispossession of Indigenous peoples.

So, when we think of how the diamond ring can be integrated into our cultures, let’s think of how wearing a diamond ring affects all our relationships with our relatives.

Ask yourself what’s the purchase of recognition in the diamond?

Why? Why do you really want to do it? The author giving this many f*cks to diamond engagement rings Musqueam, Squamish, Tsleil-Waututh Territories February 2014

Why? Why do you really want to do it?
The author giving this many f*cks to diamond engagement rings
Musqueam, Squamish, Tsleil-Waututh Territories
February 2014

I’m optimistic about reconnecting with our love stories. The next part gets better.

 

References

Bielawski, Ellen. Rogue Diamonds: The Rush for Northern Riches on Dene Land. Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre, 2003.

Hardt and Negri. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Press, 2005.

Moosa, Tauriq. “A man’s perspective on why engagement rings are a joke.” The Guardian November 2, 2013. Accessed February 2, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/02/dont-buy-an-engagement-ring.

Woodhouse, Christopher Montague. “Cecil Rhodes.” Encyclopaedia Britannica. Accessed February 2, 2014. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/501604/Cecil-Rhodes

Advertisements

One thought on “Part Two: diamond rings

  1. Pingback: Toxic-Masculine Love – Identity Crisis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s